ABSOLUTE BEING

                    
                    When you were holding
everything in hand in one great effront-

ery, nothing could
force you to admit the fabrication

of will that you wished
to appear given in natural law.


That today is text remembered still from
yesterday, tossed with the tense of one who

thinks he can remember clearly what is
gone and stamped finished and rubbed beyond sight.


There is no doubt of
the years that transpired since your mother bore

you: is that abso-
lute reality or not? Can there be

a doubt that SOMETHING
definite between then and now occurred?

You wish not to be
a statistical average of ran-

dom events occur-
ring between date A and date B but some-

thing on which critics--
even Fish men--could not equivocate.


You wish not to be something vaguely re-
membered even by you, but rather like

a hard-edged cup and saucer in an old
'fifties diner with chrome and big mirrors.


Well, there is silence,
the denial of text, the withdrawal

into negative
action, which becomes positive by its

outrageous contra-
diction. You wish that to be radical

realism, but
wishes won't do in the blindness of no.


Wishing, of course, can fade and lose focus.
There is the field of primitive action,

where life becomes death through acts of one's will.
Good God, do you have to kill or be killed,

then, to be a hard-edged real live someone?
Is all but blood and guts equivocal?


Absolute presence,
wish or not, leads to absolute absence.

Kind God, then, grant one
the angst of being at the edge of fog.


3 May 1992

Copyright 1995 by Richard P. Richter


In the Genesis Document, Part Two, we talk about a "textual hologram" and refer to Hans Bertens's commentary on the unstable subject who inhabits the postmodern.