Baseball/Softball   Bouncing Ball  EMC #1   EMC #2   Footwear   Golf   Gymnastics   Volleyball   Weight Lifting  

THE WAY THE BALL BOUNCES

 

HOME   SPORTS   PHYSICS

Extensions Exercises:
Elasticity

Recoilability

Linear velocity 
of each ball 

Biomechanical Principles to be Investigated:
Coeficient of elasticity 

Purpose
This is a good lab for bringing in some direct applications of physics.  Energy conservation is important here.  The concept of elasticity is related to the ball’s spring like ability to convert kinetic energy to potential energy and back to kinetic energy.  The kinetic energies before and after the ball hits the surface are related by energy conservation to the drop and bounce heights, so you are in effect using energy conservation to determine the balls elasticity.

Each sport utilizes its own special type of equipment and playing surface.  How easy or difficult it will be to throw, catch, bat, kick or strike a particular game ball with the hand or racquet will depend on a) composition of the ball, b) temperature of the ball, c) composition of the surface it contacts and d) relative speed of both the game ball and the hand or implement. Why?  This lab will investigate the coefficient of elasticity for a variety of game balls:
         e =  bounce height
                  drop height

Rationale
The vast majority of lever segments of the human body favor the development of speed and distance (i.e., third class lever system) over the development of force production (i.e., second class lever system).  Thus, the ability to move one’s body quickly or to quickly throw or kick an object a considerable distance requires tremendous internal force production by the athlete.  Two-thirds to three-fourths of our skeletal musculature is arranged in a pennate variation in order to maximize force production by distributing a large number of muscle fibers within a given cross-sectional area.  But, despite the most advantageous pennate arrangement of muscle fibers, force production is finite (i.e., per sarcomere :  22 - 28  N/cm2).

The evolution of sports equipment has always been guided by a combination of physical attributes and limitations of the athlete. The use of lighter materials with greater elastic properties, more shock absorbing materials, more weather-resistant materials, and materials with lower air/fluid drag coefficients have substantially improved athletic performances over the past decade.

Athletic success requires individual optimization of physical condition; selection of the most effective sports equipment for individual somatotype, position and ability level and participation in a sport which depends upon the innate athletic ability of the individual.  Coaches and athletes should guard against substituting the larger rewards gained from rigorous physical conditioning and long hours of skill and agility training with the more limited rewards gained from advances in sports equipment design.   

References
Brooks, G.A., Fahey, T.D., & White, T.P. (1996).  Exercise Physiology:  Human Bioenergics and Its Applications (2nd ed.).  Mountain View, CA:  Mayfielf  Publishing Co.

Kreighbaum, E. & Barthels, K.M. (1996).  Biomechanics (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon